Cowboys

The Micah Parsons trade: Genius move or huge mistake for the Cowboys?

Now that the Dallas Cowboys added defensive tackle Quinnen Williams, does that mean the Micah Parsons trade was worth it? Not exactly.

Now that the Dallas Cowboys added defensive tackle Quinnen Williams, does that mean the Micah Parsons trade was worth it? Not exactly.
JOHN FISHER
Jennifer Bubel
Sports journalist who grew up in Dallas, TX. Lover of all things sports, she got her degree from Texas Tech University (Wreck ‘em Tech!) in 2011. Joined Diario AS USA in 2021 and now covers mostly American sports (primarily NFL, NBA, and MLB) as well as soccer from around the world.
Update:

When the Dallas Cowboys traded away All-Pro edge rusher Micah Parsons before the 2025 NFL season, the move sent shockwaves through the league. Parsons wasn’t just the face of the Cowboys’ defense. He was the defense. So when Jerry Jones shipped him to Green Bay in exchange for two first-round picks and Pro Bowl defensive tackle Kenny Clark, fans were in disbelief.

Now, with the Cowboys adding All-Pro defensive tackle Quinnen Williams using part of that return, the picture has grown more complex. On paper, Dallas gained talent, cap space, and long-term flexibility. But on the field, they may have lost the very thing that made their defense elite.

Did the Cowboys win or lose the Micah Parsons trade?

The case for the trade: Smart cap management and defensive depth

From a financial standpoint, Jones pulled off a strategic move. The Cowboys are projected to save nearly $70 million in salary over the next three seasons compared to what Parsons is earning in Green Bay. That breathing room has already helped secure contract extensions for key players like Tyler Smith, DaRon Bland, and Jake Ferguson, while leaving room for future deals.

Adding Quinnen Williams, a three-time Pro Bowler and one of the most disruptive defensive tackles in football, gives Dallas a dominant interior presence, something they have lacked for years. Pairing Williams with Kenny Clark also improves the team’s run defense, an area that often struggled with Parsons flying off the edge.

The case against the trade: Losing a generational talent

But the other side of the argument is harder to ignore. Parsons is more than just a good player. He’s transformational. Through four seasons in Dallas, the Cowboys ranked first in defensive EPA per play with him on the field and last without him. Let that sink in.

Now thriving in Green Bay, Parsons continues to rank among league leaders in sacks and quarterback pressures, proving jus how significant his impact really is. While Williams and Clark are excellent players, neither changes a game the way Parsons does.

Verdict: Only time will tell

In the end, the Parsons trade represents the eternal NFL balancing act: short-term talent vs long-term flexibility. The Cowboys are now younger on the line, they added a Pro Bowl-caliber duo in Williams and Clark, and gained financial control that could pay off in coming years.

But they also gave up a generational talent, a leader, and the core of their defense. Unless Williams and the revamped front seven can replicate Parsons’ game-wrecking influence (and Dallas finally turns that flexibility into playoff success), then this trade will remain one of Jerry Jones’ boldest and most controversial gambles.

Related stories

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.

Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

Tagged in:
Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

We recommend these for you in NFL