Finance

From meme to meltdown: Why the “Inverse Cramer” strategy has Wall Street on edge

The CNBC host says artificial intelligence isn’t a bubble. History, and the internet, beg to differ.

The CNBC host says artificial intelligence isn’t a bubble. History, and the internet, beg to differ.
Dado Ruvic
Calum Roche
Sports-lover turned journalist, born and bred in Scotland, with a passion for football (soccer). He’s also a keen follower of NFL, NBA, golf and tennis, among others, and always has an eye on the latest in science, tech and current affairs. As Managing Editor at AS USA, uses background in operations and marketing to drive improvements for reader satisfaction.
Update:

Jim Cramer has once again reassured investors that everything is fine. Which, if you know Jim Cramer’s track record, is precisely why the internet thinks it isn’t.

What is the “Inverse Cramer”?

The CNBC host, whose stock picks have historically aged like milk in the sun, declared this week that the billions pouring into artificial intelligence are nothing like the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s. Back then, he infamously told viewers internet stocks were “the only ones worth owning” – right before the crash. More recently, he advised against Netflix and HP just before both surged. Even the 2008 financial crisis has a Cramer subplot.

It’s no wonder that an “Inverse Cramer” ETF – effectively betting against his calls – briefly existed, and that social media turns every new pronouncement into a punchline.

“Big Tech is too big to fail”

Cramer isn’t buying the bubble talk. In his view, Silicon Valley’s giants are too flush with cash to implode. “If Google and Amazon and Meta make bad investments and take big losses, that’s just another day at the office,” he said. Worst case, they can write off the losses, pivot, and carry on.

He even suggested that skepticism about AI hype acts as a safety valve: if everyone jumped in without doubt, “we’d all drown.”

Critics aren’t convinced about AI position

Plenty of analysts, however, see familiar red flags. For example, Nvidia’s $100 billion investment into its biggest customer, OpenAI, struck many as “circular financing” – a move that props up both companies until the music stops. Meanwhile, US growth looks impressive on paper, but job revisions show hundreds of thousands fewer roles than expected, and household debt is climbing. There are some experts in the field though that suggest a crash could actually help everyday Americans.

But back to Cramer and what happens when he pushes out a strong opinion. Here’s some of the online reaction...

Ironically, one user asked X’s own artificial intelligence, Grok, for some insight. The response was clear enough:

“Jim Cramer argues the AI boom is sustainable, unlike the dotcom bubble, due to stronger fundamentals in Big Tech like better funding and real applications. Critics often see his optimism as a contrarian signal, given his past calls. What’s your take?”

Clearly no one knows for sure what lies ahead, and there are a number of options available to Washington to take more control. For now, though, markets keep climbing, Cramer keeps smiling, and trolls and meme artists sharpen their pitchforks... just in case history repeats itself.

Related stories

Get your game on! Whether you’re into NFL touchdowns, NBA buzzer-beaters, world-class soccer goals, or MLB home runs, our app has it all.

Dive into live coverage, expert insights, breaking news, exclusive videos, and more – plus, stay updated on the latest in current affairs and entertainment. Download now for all-access coverage, right at your fingertips – anytime, anywhere.

Tagged in:
Comments
Rules

Complete your personal details to comment

We recommend these for you in Latest news